Legal Opinion

Re/Max R.E. Professionals, Inc. v. Armstrong

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1997No. 4-96-0837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN

delivered the opinion of the court:

In March 1991, plaintiff, RE/MAX R.E. Professionals, Inc. (RE/ MAX), filed a two-count complaint against defendants, Gary R. Armstrong and Jane Armstrong, alleging that it was entitled to recover a real estate commission under the terms of a listing agreement and a withdrawal agreement. In January 1995, RE/MAX filed a motion for summary judgment as to count I (breach of contract), and in March 1995, the trial court granted RE/MAX’s motion. The Armstrongs appeal, arguing that (1) the docket entry did not constitute an entry of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Watkins v. SchmittIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Abbott v. Amoco Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Truman L. Flatt & Sons Co. v. SchupfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Kellner v. BartmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Podolsky and Associates LP v. DiscipioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Podolsky & Associates v. DiscipioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Re/Max R.E. Professionals, Inc. v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API