Re/Max R.E. Professionals, Inc. v. Armstrong
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN
delivered the opinion of the court:
In March 1991, plaintiff, RE/MAX R.E. Professionals, Inc. (RE/ MAX), filed a two-count complaint against defendants, Gary R. Armstrong and Jane Armstrong, alleging that it was entitled to recover a real estate commission under the terms of a listing agreement and a withdrawal agreement. In January 1995, RE/MAX filed a motion for summary judgment as to count I (breach of contract), and in March 1995, the trial court granted RE/MAX’s motion. The Armstrongs appeal, arguing that (1) the docket entry did not constitute an entry of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Estate of HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Watkins v. SchmittIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Abbott v. Amoco Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Truman L. Flatt & Sons Co. v. SchupfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Kellner v. BartmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Podolsky and Associates LP v. DiscipioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Podolsky & Associates v. DiscipioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Re/Max R.E. Professionals, Inc. v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997