Legal Opinion

Podolsky and Associates LP v. Discipio

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1998No. 1-97-3339PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon

Plaintiff Podolsky and Associates L.E (Podolsky) appeals a judgment entered at the close of evidence in a bench trial in the circuit court of Cook County that it was not entitled to a commission for a sale of real estate. It argues the court should have entered judgment in its favor on its breach of contract action or, in the alternative, that it is entitled to a retrial because the court erred in excluding certain evidence. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

FACTS

In November 1990, Podolsky entered into two agreements (collectively, the listing agreements) to act as exclusive agent with…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. The People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wilson v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. PecoraroIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Saunders v. Michigan Avenue National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Esser v. McIntyreIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. People v. SantosIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Pope Ex Rel. Pope v. Economy Fire & Cas.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Reichert v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API