Legal Opinion

Mente Group LLC v. Arnell Enterprises, Inc

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 22, 2022No. 5:20-cv-07459Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MENTE GROUP LLC, Case No. 20-cv-07459-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 10 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 11 ARNELL ENTERPRISES, INC, Re: Dkt. No. 52 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff and counter-defendant Mente Group LLC (“Mente”) moves for an award of 15 attorneys’ fees and costs. Dkt. No. 52. Defendant and counter-claimant Arnell Enterprises, 16 Inc. (“Arnell”) opposes the motion.1 Dkt. No. 54. The Court finds Mente’s motion suitable for 17 decision without oral argument. See Dkt.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Green International, Inc. v. SolisTexas Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API