Legal Opinion

State v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1941PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

A painstaking scrutiny of the record, and a careful consideration of the questions presented in brief of counsel for defendant fail to disclose prejudicial error.

The first exception relates to the admission in evidence of photographs identified as having been taken at one o’clock on the morning of 14 December at the scene where the body of deceased was found, one the “way it was when we got there” — and the other after he was turned over “to get a facial picture of him to see if he could be definitely identified.” Tbe seventh exception is directed to the action of the solicitor in showing the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. . MaysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API