Sampson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
New accouterments of our criminal justice system are either more fundamental or more precious than the accused’s right to an impartial jury. That right is threatened when — as in this case — juror dishonesty occurs during the voir dire process yet is not discovered until well after final judgment has entered on the jury’s verdict. But finality is also valuable, and not every instance of juror dishonesty requires setting aside a previously rendered verdict.
In its present posture, this case poses important questions about when and under what circumstances the belated…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Ramirez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Maldonado-PenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. TsarnaevCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.