Legal Opinion

Territory v. Richardson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1904No. Criminal No. 179PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Santa Cruz. George R. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.

Section 524 of the Penal Code of Arizona reads as follows: “Every person who maliciously digs up, removes, displaces, breaks or otherwise injures or destroys any public highway or bridge, or any private way laid out by authority of law, or bridge upon such highway or private way, is punishable by imprisonment in the territorial prison not exceeding five years, or in the county jail not exceeding six months. ’ ’ Under this section an indictment was found against the defendants in the following terms: “R. R. Richardson and James Johnson are accused by the grand jury of the county of Santa Cruz,…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Nixon v. EdwardsWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Board of Supervisors v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API