Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Davidsen
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 7, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Maximilian Moss, S.
After making bequests of small sums to a church and to a blood nephew and a nephew by marriage, testatrix gave the residuary estate in equal shares “to each and everyone of my brothers and sisters or my late husband’s brothers or sisters who shall survive me. Should any such *603brothers or sisters of mine or my late husband predecease me, then and in that event, the share which they would have taken shall be divided among and between such children as they may leave surviving them, per stirpes and not per capita. This provision for my Residuary Estate is intended to and shall…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Matter of PulisNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In Re the Accounting of MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MaguireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Estate of JenkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- First Interstate Bank of Denver v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- McClain v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995