Legal Opinion
Heironimus v. Tate
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 28, 1962No. 10935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Justice.
This suit was brought to construe the will of A. A. Biebel, deceased, duly probated in the County Court of Travis County September 2, 1958.
The suit was filed by Frank J. Heironimus and other coindependent executors (trix) named in the will, and all beneficiaries under the will were parties to the suit, including Mrs. Mathilda Scott and Joyce Tate, the bequests to whom are the core of this controversy.
The answering defendants, appellees herein, 1 included Joyce Tate, but not Mrs. Scott.
Appellants and appellees filed motions for summary judgment. The motion of appellees was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Adams v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. RubionTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Bell v. Board of Directors of Pythian Widows & Orphans HomeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perfect Union Lodge No. 10 v. Interfirst Bank of San Antonio, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Sarah v. Primarily Primates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Bradford v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- City of Austin v. Austin National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.