Legal Opinion

Williams v. Riley Drug Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1925No. 15949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The principle of law laid down in the second division of the syllabus does not appear to have been heretofore dealt with' either by the Supreme Court of this State or by this court, but the rule adopted appears to be supported by the great weight of general authority. The rule is stated in 32 Cye. 55, as follows: “Forbearance by the creditor or obligee is sufficient consideration for the contract of a surety, although a definite time is not agreed upon; and if, in reliance upon the agreement of the surety, the creditor forbears to bring suit against the principal, or grants him an extension…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Security National Bank of Minneapolis v. PulverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. United & Globe Rubber Manufacturing Companies v. ConardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. Bunn v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Middle Georgia & Atlantic Railroad v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Ver Nooy v. PitnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nalley Land & Investment Co. v. Merchants & Planters BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Oliver v. Citizens DeKalb BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Griswold v. Wells Aluminum, Moultrie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Phoenix Air Conditioning Co. v. Towne House Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Reed v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API