Legal Opinion
United & Globe Rubber Manufacturing Companies v. Conard
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 14, 1910PublishedCited by 13 opinions
On error to tlie Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of. the court was delivered by
Pitney, Chancellor.
This action was founded upon .i bond under seal, bearing date September 18th, 1907, made by the Standard Rubber Company as principal and Messrs. Brady, Wright and Reeves as sureties, whereby they acknowledged themselves to be indebted unto the plaintiff in the sum of $6,000, with a condition thereunder written of which the following is a copy:
“The condition of the above obligation is such, that whereas the said United and Globe Rubber Manufacturing Companies of Trenton, New Jersey, have extended to the said Standard Rubber Company a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strong v. . SheffieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Howe v. TaggartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Cowdrey v. CowdreyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baker v. Citizens State Bank of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Linder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- Rothman Realty Corp. v. MacLainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Kennedy v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Town of WellstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.