Legal Opinion

United States v. Kelley

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 30, 1999No. ARMY 9600727Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

SQUIRES, Judge:

This case initially came before this court for review pursuant to Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellate defense counsel assigned one error which we disposed of adversely to appellant. United States v. Kelley, 48 M.J. 677 (Army Ct.Crim. App.1998).

In a supplement to a petition for grant of review before the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the same appellate defense counsel raised the identical error set forth in this court, and, for the first time, asserted that the application of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. Gomez v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. GorskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. Murphy v. Judges of the United States Army Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API