Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny Lynn QUALLS, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1999No. 95-50378PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL; Partial concurrence and Partial dissent by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS.

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

In United States v. Qualls, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 398, 142 L.Ed.2d 323 (1998), the Supreme Court vacated our en banc opinion in this case, and remanded it to us for reconsideration in light of Caron v. United States, 524 U.S. 308, 118 S.Ct. 2007, 141 L.Ed.2d 303 (1998). After careful reconsideration, we affirm Qualls’ conviction.

BACKGROUND

In 1975, Danny Lynn Qualls (“Qualls”) pled guilty to assault with a deadly weapon in violation of California Penal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Caron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Erwin Estuardo Garcia-Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Anibal Jose Diaz-ArguetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Meza-Corrales, United States of America v. Ramon Lamark Bridges,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Ozine BridgeforthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Pablo StallingsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API