Legal Opinion

Parra v. Four Seasons Hotel

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 23, 2009No. Civil Action 05cv12354-NGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

GERTNER, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum and Order, the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (document #41) is GRANTED in its entirety. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (document # 37) is DENIED. The Court determines that the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Four Seasons Hotel has provided a legitimate, nondiscriminatory basis for the plaintiffs termination, while the plaintiff has not offered sufficient evidence tending to show pretext. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to judgment on plaintiffs…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saenger v. Montefiore Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API