Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramsey

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 1, 1992No. ACMR 9101640PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WERNER, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge *734sitting as a general court-martial of wrongfully and intentionally inflicting injury upon himself in a hostile fire pay zone, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for eighteen months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. The convening authority approved partial forfeitures in the amount of $500.00 pay per month for eighteen…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. PooleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. HuntUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. MarchU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RamseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. KordaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API