Strunk v. United States House of Representatives
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff Christopher Earl Strunk, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nina Gershon, Judge) granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2). In a generally unintelligible complaint filed in April 1999, Strunk alleged that various officials of the United States and New York State governments had violated his rights…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- David R. Kittay, Trustee v. Daniel J. Kornstein and Kornstein Veisz & WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
3Cited by45 opinions
- Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. RD Legal Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Mcgraw-Hill Global Educ. Holdings, LLC v. Mehul Mathrani, Ankush Sharma, Anshoo Sharma, & Ibestbargains, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- 331 W 38TH STREET LLC, et al. v. PENN-STAR INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Adams v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Banks v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.