Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Nunley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2011No. Docket No. 302181Published

1DissentSaad, P.J.

I. INTRODUCTION

I respectfully dissent because the certificate of mailing is nontestimonial. Accordingly, I would reverse the circuit court’s order.

The majority incorrectly holds that because proof of notice is an element of driving while license suspended (DWLS), the certificate of mailing produced by the Secretary of State is testimonial. This analysis is flawed because it does not address the context in which the certificate was created, and it reasons backwards to conclude that a statement must be testimonial if it relates to an element of the crime. In Davis v Washington, 547 US 813; 126…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API