Legal Opinion
Tungsten Mining Corporation v. District 50, United Mine Workers of America
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1957No. 7293_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Tungsten Mining Corporation (Tungsten) sued Defendant-appellee District 50, United Mine Workers of America (District 50) for damages under Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 187(a) (3) and 187(b). Tungsten claimed that in January 1953 District 50, through an unlawful strike, caused damage to Tungsten’s business; and that the strike was unlawful because one of its objects was to force Tungsten to recognize District 50 as bargaining representative of Tungsten’s employees, although at that time United Stone &…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Painters District Council No. 38, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, Afl-Cio v. Edgewood Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Aacon Contracting Co. v. Ass'n of Catholic Trade UnionistsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
- Kinty v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- John L. Parks v. Atlanta Printing Pressmen And Assistant's Union No. 8Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Haughton v. International Woodworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.