Legal Opinion · Dissent

Catlin v. Sobol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1990Published

1DissentKane, J.

We agree with the majority’s analysis and its conclusion that there is nothing unreasonable or irrational in the Commissioner’s interpretation of Education Law § 3202 and his finding that Dell was not a resident of the Edmeston Central School District and thus not entitled to a free tuition education at the expense of the district. We depart from the decision of the majority where it finds that the parents have overcome the concomitant presumption that a child’s residence is that of his parents.

The presumption may be overcome by demonstrating that the parent does not exercise control over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Horowitz v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 6 v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. In re the Guardianship of MoncrieffeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API