Legal Opinion

Wesala v. City of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1986No. C7-86-218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appeal is made from a summary judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint alleging negligence by respondent city. Appellant claims the trial court erred because (1) genuine issues regarding causa tion exist and (2) respondent does not possess governmental immunity. We affirm.

FACTS

On November 15, 1984, at 11:00 a.m., appellant Clara Wesala parked her car near the Virginia High School where she was going to perform volunteer work. It rained earlier that morning, but had cleared in 30° temperatures. The rain had frozen, creating icy conditions. The street had not been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Lorshbough v. Township of BuzzleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Mattson v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Robinson v. HollatzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. City of RulevilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. James J. Benes & Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Berg v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re the Appointment of a Trustee for the Heirs of JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Doyle v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API