Legal Opinion
Farber v. H & K Perforating QPI, LLC
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 31, 2023No. 3:21-cv-01723Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT W. FARBER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-CV-01723 v. (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) H & K PERFORATING QPI, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court are two motions in limine filed by Plaintiff Robert W. Farber (“Farber”) (Doc. 71; Doc. 75), and six motions in limine filed by Defendants Bulls Acquisition Company, LLC, H & K Perforating QPI, LLC, H & K Perforating, LLC, and Andrew Strang (collectively, “H&K”) (Doc. 77; Doc. 81; Doc. 83; Doc. 87; Doc. 89; Doc. 103). Plaintiff Farber initiated this action by filing a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Walter v. Cross, A/K/A Bobo Walter v. Cross, United States of America v. Jules C. MelograneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.