Legal Opinion

Gombert v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the city of North Tonawanda there is a highway known as Wheatfield street, which runs substantially east and west, and crosses at grade the tracks of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, which run practically north and south. The Lehigh Valley railroad uses these tracks in its traffic between Buffalo and Niagara Falls. On the 2d day of October, 1905, the plaintiff was driving across these tracks on Wheatfield street, and collided with a south-bound Lehigh Valley train. The crossing was equipped with gates operated by compressed air from a tower maintained by the New York…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Masterton v. . Village of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Kronold v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Weir v. Union Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Steitz v. GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Walsh v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Smith v. CorsatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Walsh v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Dingus v. CainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API