Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Baylor Medical Center at Garland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2008No. 06-0491Published

1DissentJustice Johnson

I recognize that there are conceptual and practical difficulties with the holding of Porter v. Vick, 888 S.W.2d 789 (Tex.1994). But those are better addressed through the rule-making process than through the decision-making process. I would not overrule Porter, and thus dissent.

Until the 1981 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure became effective, former Rule 329b(3) provided that motions and amended motions for new trial must be determined “within not exceeding forty-five (45) days after the original or amended motion is filed,” unless the parties agreed otherwise in writing. Absent an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Fruehauf Corp. v. CarrilloTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re the City of GeorgetownTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Freeman v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API