Legal Opinion · Dissent

New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department v. Whitener

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1994No. 13092Published

1DissentHartz, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Although much of the majority opinion finds support in the Supreme Court’s language in United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 109 S.Ct. 1892, 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989), this ease appears to be distinguishable from Halper in two important respects. First, the full amount of the tax could rationally be justified on grounds other than punishment of Whitener. Second, because the criminal prosecution and the tax collection were pursued concurrently, the tax collection is probably not a subsequent prosecution for the purposes of double-jeopardy doctrine.

The novel questions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API