Legal Opinion
Bridget A. Monroe v. Kenneth W. Sieczkowski
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 4, 2026No. 2:21-cv-20231Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BRIDGET A. MONROE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-20231 (ES) (MAH) v. ORDER KENNETH W. SIECZKOWSKI, Defendant. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Kenneth W. Sieczkowski’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss, (D.E. No. 52 (“Mot.”); D.E. No. 5-1 (“Mov. Br.”)), Bridget A. Monroe’s (“Plaintiff”) amended complaint, (D.E. No. 47 (“Am. Compl.”)). The Court resolves Defendant’s motion without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L. Civ. R. 78.1(b). For the reasons set forth below, that motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.