Legal Opinion

In Re the Paternity of C.C.M.: M.M. v. V.K.H.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2012No. 64A03-1205-JP-230Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of FILED establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. Dec 26 2012, 9:37 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: CLERK of the supreme court, DEBRA LYNCH DUBOVICH court of appeals and tax court Levy & Dubovich Highland, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA IN RE THE PATERNITY OF C.C.M.: ) ) M.M., ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. 64A03-1205-JP-230 ) V.K.H., ) ) Appellee. ) ) APPEAL FROM THE PORTER SUPERIOR COURT The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Gary v. MajorIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bueter v. BrinkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Whitfield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. MoriarityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Aiken v. StanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API