Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Stanley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2004No. 64A05-0405-CV-254PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In February 2004, Robyn Stanley petitioned for and received an Ex Parte Order of Protection against William Aiken. Following a hearing in March 2004, the trial court issued a permanent Order of Protection against Aiken which provided, among other things, that Aiken have no contact with Stanley for one year. Aiken appeals that judgment and presents a single issue for review: whether Stanley presented sufficient evidence to support the trial court's order of protection under the Indiana Civil Protection Order Act ("CPOA"), Indiana Code Section 34-26-5-1…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Abouhalkah v. SharpsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. A.S. v. T.H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Mysliwy v. MysliwyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Nunley v. NunleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Allen Stewart v. Jennifer MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. As v. THIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API