Aiken v. Stanley
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In February 2004, Robyn Stanley petitioned for and received an Ex Parte Order of Protection against William Aiken. Following a hearing in March 2004, the trial court issued a permanent Order of Protection against Aiken which provided, among other things, that Aiken have no contact with Stanley for one year. Aiken appeals that judgment and presents a single issue for review: whether Stanley presented sufficient evidence to support the trial court's order of protection under the Indiana Civil Protection Order Act ("CPOA"), Indiana Code Section 34-26-5-1…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Abouhalkah v. SharpsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by9 opinions
- A.S. v. T.H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mysliwy v. MysliwyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Nunley v. NunleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Allen Stewart v. Jennifer MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- As v. THIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.