Legal Opinion

Moore v. Roddie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1918No. 14770PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for ■King county, Ronald, J., entered November 23, 1917, ■upon an order granting a motion for judgment not'withstanding verdict, in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— In this action appellants recovered damages for personal injuries caused by respondent’s automobile. Respondent owned two automobiles, a touring car and a Metz roadster, used principally for business. One Wakelin was employed to drive both cars when occasion arose, both day and evening. The cars were kept at a garage some distance from the home. On the evening of the accident respondent had the touring car at home. It is claimed by respondent that the driver, without his knowledge and consent, took the Metz car from the garage to go to his own home for his supper, and that this he had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knust v. BullockWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kneff v. SanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Purdy v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Babbitt v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Meyn v. Dulaney-Miller Auto Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McMullen v. Warren Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Clark v. FeldmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API