Legal Opinion

United States v. Taliaferro

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 29, 1975No. CM 432736PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SNEEDEN, Chief Judge:

CASE SUMMARY

The accused, contrary to his pleas, was convicted of nine specifications of making checks with knowledge of insufficient funds and two specifications alleging forgery of checks. After the findings the trial counsel offered into evidence, not in rebuttal, two additional checks found in the same search as the offenses charged. The checks relating to the uncharged offenses of forgery were offered over objection of defense counsel. His objection was overruled and the evidence admitted. The staff judge advocate in his review addressed the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. VickersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. SchreckU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. BlackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. VickersU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API