Legal Opinion

Darling v. Blazek

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 5, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court. — Hon. J. H. Rothrook, Judge. Action at law to recover upon a promissory note, made by one Rodewald to the defendant Blazek, and by him indorsed in blank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

1. At the commencement of this action, Rodewald, the maker of the note, was a resident of Cedar Rapids, in Linn County, Iowa, and the appellant Blazek, indorser of the note, was a resident of Tama. The action was brought against the maker and indorser jointly in the superior court of Cedar Rapids. Appellant appeared to the action, and, upon a showing of his residence in Tama County, asked that the cause be removed to the district court of that county for trial. The motion was denied, and error is assigned on the ruling. The objection here made raises two questions for consideration: Hirst,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stout & Co. v. NotemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Ahls v. Sherwood/Division of Harsco Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Bennett Savings Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Davis v. RudolphSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API