Legal Opinion

Lyng v. Michigan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1890No. 1219PublishedCited by 112 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Plaintiff in error was prosecuted and convicted in the Circuit Court for Iron County, Michigan, under an information alleging “that on the 19th day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight, at the village of- Iron River, in said Iron County, Henry Lyng, then and. there being, was a person whose business consisted in part of selling at wholesale brewed and malt liquors, (not proprietary…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Plaintiff in error was prosecuted and convicted in the Circuit Court for Iron County, Michigan, under an information alleging “that on the 19th day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight, at the village of- Iron River, in said Iron County, Henry Lyng, then and. there being, was a person whose business consisted in part of selling at wholesale brewed and malt liquors, (not proprietary patent medicine,) as agent for Franz Hagemeister and Henry Hagemeister, copartners doing business in the city of Green…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee

delivered the opinion of the court.. Under the statute in question, which is entitled “ An act to provide for the taxation and regulation of the business of manufacturing, selling, keeping for sale, furnishing, giving or delivering spirituous or intoxicating liquors and malt, brewed or fermented liquors or vinous liquors in this State, and to repeal all acts or parts of acts inconsistent with .the. provisions of this act,” an annual tax is levied “ upon the business of selling, only brewed or malt liquors at wholesale or retail, or at wholesale and retail” of three hundred dollars, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API