Legal Opinion
State v. Navaro
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1933No. 5430PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, Justice.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of unlawful possession of mariguana. He appeals and makes fourteen separate assignments of error which have been grouped and argued by appellant under two general heads: (1) Insufficiency of the information to charge a crime and of the evidence to support the verdict; and (2) failure of the state to prove the negative allegations of the information.
The information charged:
“That the said Pablo Navaro, on the 6th day of February, A. D. 1933, at the County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HendricksonUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. Erminie MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. MoronatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- State v. Chin GimNevada Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. WintersUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Automated Geographic Reference CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.