Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. HomeAway.com, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 9, 2017No. 3:15-cv-01984-MOPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN, Chief United States District Judge :
Plaintiff City of Portland (“the City”) sued Defendants HomeAway.com, Inc. and HomeAway, Inc. (collectively “HomeA-way”) for failure to comply, with various provisions of the Portland City Code collectively known as the “Transient Lodgings Tax.” After I dismissed its original Complaint [1], the City filed an Amended Complaint [34], which HomeAway' now moves to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, HomeAway’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [37] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
BACKGROUND
HomeAway…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.