Legal Opinion
R. J. Caldwell Co. v. Fisk Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 3, 1933No. 2718PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an action of tort for wrongful interference by the defendants with a contract between the plaintiff (whieh wo shall refer to as the Caldwell Co.) and the Connecticut Mills Company (which we shall refer to as the Mills). It was tried before a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant. The *476present question is whether that direction was right.
The Fisk Company was a large user of tire fabrics. The Connecticut Mills manufactured them. Caldwell was selling agent for the Connecticut Mills, getting his pay from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- R. J. Caldwell Co. v. Connecticut Mills Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- R.J. Caldwell Company, Inc. v. Connecticut Mills Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Glover v. Lee, Higginson Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Allied International, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Allied International, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Taxin v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1950