Legal Opinion
In Re: Neil Navarro
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 30, 2019No. 19-12612-EPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Neil Navarro has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Michael Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Carlos Granda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Marcus CrawleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Lance CannonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. George StoneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.