Legal Opinion
Arthur R. Weir and Quikbrik Company of Chicago, Inc. v. Chicago Plastering Institute, Defendants,-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 23, 1959No. 12694PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASTLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, Arthur R. Weir and Quikbrik Company of Chicago, Inc., brought suit in the District Court to recover for damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiffs to business and property by reason of a boycott. Defendants-appellees are Chicago Plastering Institute Inc., 1 *Journeymen Plasterers Protective and Benevolent Society, OP & CFIA, Local Union No. 5, 2 Employing Plasterers Contractors Association of Chicago 3 , Byron W. Dalton, 4 J. W. Farr & Co. 5 and J. Woodcock.5
Plaintiffs predicate liability of defendants for treble damages under 15 U.S. C.A.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hunt v. CrumbochSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sherman H. Skolnick v. Charles T. Martin, Arthur Lilly, and Charles R. PerrigoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- North v. Madison Area Ass'n for Retarded Citizens-Developmental Centers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- National Gas Appliance Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc. And Ab ElectroluxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Tobman v. Cottage Woodcraft ShopDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.