Legal Opinion

Randall M. Hinton v. Village of Pulaski

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2019No. 35Â SSM 27Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 35 SSM 27 Randall M. Hinton, Appellant, v. Village of Pulaski, Respondent. Submitted by John A. Cirando, for appellant. Submitted by Brian W. McElhenny, for respondent. New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials, amicus curiae. MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The Village of Pulaski Code provides, in relevant part, that “[n]o civil action shall be maintained” against defendant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Poirier v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SpitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Groninger v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. San Marco v. Village/Town of Mount KiscoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API