Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cate v. Dover Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1990No. C-9186Published

1ConcurrenceSpears, Justice

Although I concur in the court’s opinion, I write separately to declare that the time has come for the legislature to consider the realities of the marketplace and prohibit all disclaimers of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness.

These implied warranties, created by common-law courts long before the adoption of the U.C.C., developed to protect purchasers from losses suffered because of “the frustration of their expectations about the worth, efficacy, or desirability” of a product. W. Keeton, Prosser and Keeton on The Law of Torts § 95A (5th ed. 1984). Implication of these…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API