Legal Opinion

People v. Trevino

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1977No. Crim. 30057PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

Robert Penida Trevino pleaded guilty to possession of heroin after his motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5 was denied. He appeals from the judgment of conviction seeking further review of the seizure of the evidence. We reverse the judgment.

The evidence which defendant would suppress is a rubber balloon containing heroin. The balloon was obtained by the arresting officer when the defendant removed it from his mouth after being ordered to do so by the officer. An additional item of evidence is a needle and a syringe which the officer removed from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. BracamonteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Conwell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. HodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. CappelliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API