Jardine v. Long

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The insistence of appellants in this controversy is that there should be a reversal by this court of the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office; which affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority to Long,, solely upon the facts.

In the reasons of appeal there are twenty assignments of error, but the substance of all these is that the evidence in behalf of Long, being entirely oral and supported by no corroborating documents or proper physical exhibits, should be held insufficient, under the law of evidence, to…