Legal Opinion

United States v. Betz

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 4, 1942No. 4368Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, holding certain merchandise-, entered at the ports of Baltimore, Md., and Philadelphia, Pa., dutiable as seaweed, manufactured, at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1540 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as claimed by the importer (appellee), rather than as a chemical compound at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 5 of that act as assessed by the collectors at the ports of importation.

*17Tbe merchandise in question, invoiced as seaweed, partly prepared, is known as “Norgine F,” and, as imported, is a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. Rockhill & VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  4. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Aetna Explosives Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API