Legal Opinion

Versluis v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1951No. 33847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

This is a proceeding for a writ of mandamus, brought by the plaintiff Leonard Versluis against Claud Hamilton, county treasurer of Muskogee county, seeking to force the defendant Hamilton to sell at tax resale certain property in the city of Haskell, Muskogee county, for unpaid assessments for street improvements made against the properties by the city of Haskell. The bonds, secured by the assessments, were issued in 1920, under the 1910 law, and the last bonds and last installment of assessments matured in 1930. Versluis alleged in his petition, and here contends, that the right to have the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Baccus v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. City of Shawnee v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Hutchman v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Jones v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Carnes v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Moss v. GoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API