Legal Opinion

Lisnek v. Law Office of Marco A. Molina

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 9, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00020Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND, INDIANA MICHAEL LISNEK, ) 31417 PROPERTIES LLC, and ) and PAXSON PROPERTIES LLP, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) No.2:20CV20-PPS/JPK ) LAW OFFICE OF MARCO A. MOLINA ) and MARCO A. MOLINA, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Michael Lisnek, 31417 Properties LLC, and Paxson Properties LLP have moved for default judgment against defendant Marco A. Molina under Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2). [DE 39.] Introduction This lawsuit arises from an attorney-client relationship that existed between the Plaintiffs and Marco…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Sanders v. TownsendIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Blasche v. Himelick, Admrs.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Norfleet v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API