Legal Opinion
Pineda v. Oceania Cruises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 27, 2017No. Civil Action No. 17–20544–Civ–ScolaPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Robert N. Scola, Jr., United States District Judge
Plaintiff Julia Damaris Toruno Pineda, while a cabin stewardess aboard the cruise-ship Nautica and in international waters, claims to have been seriously injured when she slipped from an allegedly defective ladder, descending from her bunk. (Compl., ECF No. 4-1, 3, ¶¶ 15, 27.) Toruno Pineda initially filed suit, in state court under the savings to suitors clause of 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1), against Defendants Nautica Acquisition, LLC, the owner of the Nautica , and Oceania Cruises, Inc., whom she alleges was her "borrowing employer." (Id. at ¶¶ 7,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aggarao v. MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Rizalyn Bautista v. Star CruisesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Khan v. Parsons Global Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Boyd v. Homes of Legend, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- Thomas v. Carnival Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cakerevic v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2023