Legal Opinion

City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1897No. 2715PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.—Hon. H. E. Hadley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was délivered by

Gordon, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a street assessment lien levied upon appellant’s property in the city of New Whatcom, pursuant to the provisions of the act of 1893 (Session Laws, p. 226, Bal. Code, §§1139-1149) providing for the re-assessment of costs of local improvements in cities and towns. At the trial below the respondent introduced a certified copy of the assessment roll accompanied by a certificate of the clerk, the report of the committee, the warrant of collection and the treasurer’s return, and rested.

The defendant thereupon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Potter v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Collins v. City of EllensburgWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rucker Bros. v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BeckOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API