Legal Opinion

Welsch v. Elk River Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1924No. Nos. 23,609, 23,610, 23,611, 23,612, 23,613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The defendant is a public service corporation engaged in generating electric current and supplying "it to municipalities and the general public. Seven or eight years ago, defendant erected a plant at the village of Elk River for generating electricity and constructed a concrete dam across the Elk river for the purpose of providing power to operate it. In .1920, needing more power, defendant raised the height of the dam about three feet by placing flashboards on the top of it. Five landowners owning separate ■ parcels of land above the dam, portions of which are overflowed by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jungblum v. Minneapolis, New Ulm & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Fossum v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Larson v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Schlag v. Gooding-Coxe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gledhill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kallevig v. HolmgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Lynch v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API