Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Grove v. Nadel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1998No. 1998-1478PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 252.] THE STATE EX REL. GROVE, APPELLANT, v. NADEL, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Grove v. Nadel,

1998-Ohio-541.] Complaint for writ of procedendo to compel common pleas court judge to journalize his decision denying relator’s motion for a transcript properly dismissed by court of appeals, when. (No. 98-1478—Submitted November 10, 1998—Decided December 30, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970324. __________________ {¶ 1} In April 1997, appellant, Mark Earl Grove, filed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Grove v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Grove v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Martin v. Judges of the Lucas County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pedraza v. KimblerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State ex rel. Lloyd v. WiestOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Moss v. McLaughlinOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Schneider v. McCartyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State ex rel. Al-Zerjawi v. Baker-RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API