Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pedraza v. Kimbler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2021No. 20CA0055-MPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Pedraza v. Kimbler,

2021-Ohio-993.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE EX REL. BENJAMIN PEDRAZA, III C.A. No. 20CA0055-M Relator v. MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF ORIGINAL ACTION IN COMMON PLEAS JUDGE JOYCE V. PROCEDENDO KIMBLER Respondent Dated: March 29, 2021 PER CURIAM. {¶1} Relator Benjamin Pedraza has filed a petition asking this Court for a writ of procedendo ordering Respondent, Judge Joyce V. Kimbler, to rule on his pending motions. Judge Kimbler has moved to dismiss the complaint as moot. Because Mr. Pedraza’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Grove v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Ward v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Deiter v. McGuireOhio Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Goodykoontz v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API