Legal Opinion

Curreri v. Verni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a shareholder’s derivative action, the defendants Vito R. Verni and Rita Coppolecchia appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered December 9, 1988, as denied their motion to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as it is asserted against them and granted the plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants challenge, inter alia, the denial of their motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint insofar as it is asserted against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barr v. WackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Ripley v. International Railways of Central AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Ripley v. International Railways of Central AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Lewis v. WelchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marx v. AkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Bryan v. West 81 Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Health-Loom Corp. v. Soho Plaza Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Bildstein v. AtwaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Miller v. SchreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API