Legal Opinion

Abels v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus.- John C. Shields for the writ.

1Per curiam

The relator asks for a mandamus to compel the supervisors to audit and allow certain claims which he has presented to them for services as a detective in the discovery and apprehension of a criminal. It is not claimed that the relator, at the time of the performance of the services, held any public office or was lawfully entitled to make the arrest except as he was authorized by being a corporator in a detective association incorporated under the laws of the State.

The act of 1859 (Comp. L., ch. 126) authorized the voluntary incorporation of companies for the detection and apprehension of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ames v. Port Huron Log Driving & Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Messmore v. KrachtMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. White v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Tate v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. O'Dell v. ScrantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API