Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Krogh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1980No. C.D. 6269PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

After a hearing upon the petition of Egil Krogh, Jr., the Board of Governors (Board) has recommended his reinstatement. He was admitted to the practice of law in this státe in 1968, and was disbarred in 1975. The opinion of this court in In re Krogh, 85 Wn.2d 462, 536 *505P.2d 578 (1975) gives his professional history and the nature and circumstances of the crime which gave rise to his disbarment. Those matters need not be detailed here. It is sufficient to say that the federal crime to which the petitioner had pleaded guilty involved his role in the burglarizing of the office of a psychiatrist.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re EddlemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WalgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Danielson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. In Re the Reinstatement of a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, RobbinsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re a Disbarred Member of the State Bar of Arizona, ArrottaArizona Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API